Author and researcher Sean Maclaren presents a four-part series that reveals how the nearly 500-year-old Society of Jesus, the Jesuits, have designed, built and destroyed the United States of America.
Using examples from all sectors of society, Maclaren also details the mechanisms used by the Jesuits to cleverly hide their efforts in plain sight, while distracting Americans with endless forms of entertainment.
The first book of the series includes chapters on Government; Politics; Religion; News and Media; Morals and Values; Guns, Drugs and Sex; Military; Healthcare and Medicine; Education; and Criminal Justice.
The book also contains 25 pages of excellent references for those who wish to investigate further.
Please ask your bookstore to carry this title (ISBN: 978-0996767736).
6″ x 9″
210 pages, 50 lb. cream paper
How An American President Is Chosen
Donald Trump was not elected President of the United States of America. He was carefully chosen by the Jesuits many years ago to fulfill a specific role that would deeply divide America, even more so than a homosexual president and his transgender wife.
During the run-up to voting day, both candidates appeared to be the least-fit of any potential candidate for the US presidency in more than 250 years. Every single American I spoke with during the weeks prior to November 8, 2016 shared the same sentiment as one elderly woman: “They both look like clowns at a three-ring circus. Who could possibly vote for such cheap trash?”
This is what the Jesuits have created in American politics: cheap and tasteless entertainment for the controlled masses.
In Europe during the inception of America, only the elite could vote. In America, nearly every man, regardless of his station, could vote. Not only this, since voting for the candidates of their choice was such a novel idea, never before seen in modern politics anywhere in the world, many of these farmers, merchants, fishermen, etc. took great interest in the political activities of their villages, towns and cities. These hard-working souls learned to vote for people who claimed to have similar values and morals, so those representatives would effectively stand for their own interests. It was a dream come true.
What those good trusting Americans did not realize then is that their representatives did not actually stand for anything other than a hook and line to attract and reel in new recruits that were soon under the control of men thousands of miles away.
Author J. Wayne Laurens, in his 1855 book, The Crisis: or, the Enemies of America Unmasked, wrote:
“An American gentleman was passenger on board a merchant ship, bound from London to Rio Janeiro. There were among the passengers Englishmen, Germans, Frenchmen, Spaniards, and Portuguese; but the person we refer to was the only American. Between himself and the English gentlemen, there were frequent discussions about politics, to which such of the other passengers, as could speak English, would listen, sometimes taking a part.
“Of course, our American was a great friend to the institutions of his own country; and defended republican forms of government, freedom of the speech and of the press, the vote by ballot, and all the other elements of popular sovereignty through thick and thin.
“Assailed on every side, he found his office of champion of freedom no sinecure. Every calm morning and every pleasant evening witnessed a new controversy on the deck or in the cabin; but he manfully held his ground against a host of adversaries; and being fluent in speech, strong in argument, skilled in logic, and full of lively and sarcastic humor, he generally came out of the debate with honor, taking care always to terminate the action at precisely the right moment, and to quit the field with flying colors.
“Among the persons who listened with the greatest attention to these debates, was a lean bilious looking old Frenchman, who always took care to be present, and who showed by his look and manner, that he was deeply interested in politics, although he never by any chance uttered an opinion or made a remark on political subjects, in the general circle of the passengers.
“In point of fact, this man was a Roman Catholic priest, a Jesuit of high standing, who was going to some station in South America, in obedience to an order from his superior. He was a cosmopolite indeed.
“Though not much past the middle point of life, he was rather aged in appearance, in consequence of the great variety and extent of the missions which he had performed in all quarters of the world, and in every kind of climate. From Canada to Calcutta; from the breezy heights of the Andes to the unwholesome marshes of Java, by sea and by land, in season and out of season, this man had journeyed on the secret errands of his order. Speaking fluently a dozen different languages, and possessing the most perfect power of dissimulation, as well as the most thorough devotedness to the church, and those carefully trained habits of obedience, which are so essential to the character of an able and faithful Jesuit, he had at length become one of the most accomplished men of his age.
“As he listened to the conversation of the American passenger, he could not help noticing, that he was gradually making converts to republican views. Many of these passengers, he observed, sought private interviews with the American; and by careful eavesdropping, he ascertained that their object was to ask questions about his country, and gain information respecting the actual working of the American attempt at self-government.
“When the passage was nearly over, the Frenchman happening to be alone with the American, in a retired part of the deck, where their conversation could not be overheard, commenced a quiet chat with him. Addressing him in English, which he spoke with ease and precision, he thanked him with apparent cordiality, for the entertainment he had derived from his conversation or rather eloquent haranguing to the other passengers, during the voyage.
“He professed to have enjoyed their debates very greatly; and gave the American due credit for his wit, his logic, his humour, his address, and his unbounded good nature.
“The American was much pleased at his compliments; for he had conceived a great respect for this silent and attentive auditor; and, in fact, had, in his own secret mind, set him down as a hopeful convert to Americanism; he thanked him, therefore, with much feeling, for his good opinion; at the same time disclaiming any merit, for success in defending a truth so self-evident, as that which is expressed in these few words—that a nation ought to govern itself, and that by the popular vote of its own citizens.
“ ‘This,’ said the Jesuit, with a quiet smile, ‘you suppose to be the system of your own country?’
“ ‘I do not suppose it,’ said the American, ‘I know it.’
“ ‘Now,’ said the Jesuit, ‘listen to me a few moments and I will tell you what I know. Your president is elected by the conclave of cardinals at Rome, the same who elect the pope. Your people nominate the candidates. Our confidential agents select from the number, the one whom they believe to be the most favorable to the interests of the church. His name with those of the other candidates is reported to the cardinals and the pope. When their decision is announced to the confidential friends of the pope and the cardinals, in the United States, they send forth their orders through the priests; and the whole Roman Catholic vote is thrown for the candidate who is favoured by the church. He, of course, is always elected. Your parties are so equally divided on politics, that this Roman Catholic vote, which is cast on purely religious considerations, is always sufficient to turn the scale.’
“The American looked rather blank at this announcement.”
Even today, very few people understand that their political system is a complete sham, and that any representatives of theirs are chosen not by them but by people who have a specific agenda counter to their own. How could this come about without the American people knowing about it, let alone understanding such Jesuit intrigue?